Review of the Hitler film: A potentially compelling revenge narrative diminished by insufficient intrigue.
The film titled "Hitler" exemplifies Vijay Antony's tendency to select provocative titles for his works. However, from the characters' actions, both protagonists and antagonists, it becomes evident that the film ultimately falls short of realizing its potential.
Hitler Movie Review: In a recent interview, actor and filmmaker Sasikumar recounted advice from Superstar Rajinikanth, emphasizing that filmmakers should never underestimate the audience of a commercial film. He noted that if viewers anticipate a hero's entrance at a specific moment, it is essential to deliver that moment, thereby validating their expectations and ensuring their satisfaction. However, this principle is effective only when the anticipated moments are substantial enough to justify their prediction and provide a rewarding experience. In Dhana’s Hitler, featuring Vijay Antony, the anticipated surprises largely fall flat, as there is little rationale for their existence. One might question whether a film starring Vijay Antony would not depict him as a protagonist who engages in theft from the affluent, reminiscent of Krishnamoorthy in Gentleman. To clarify, predictability is not inherently problematic in such narratives, nor are overt inspirations. The real issue lies in the assumption that the audience, who willingly embarked on the cinematic journey, would not feel disillusioned by its shortcomings.
The film commences in a forested village plagued by rampant labor exploitation, where the absence of a proper bridge complicates the crossing of a river. The relentless rainfall, inadequate infrastructure, and a line of women traversing the river, all depicted in a monochromatic palette, foreshadow impending calamity. As the narrative transitions to the present, we find ourselves on the brink of a state election, momentarily setting aside the initial scene, fully aware that this earlier misfortune will significantly influence the storyline. For the time being, we choose to overlook it. Subsequently, an unemployed Vijay Antony forges a forced friendship with Redin Kingsley’s character, becoming his roommate. Concurrently, he encounters the heroine (Riya Suman), leading to a series of charming interactions that allow him to showcase his physical prowess while being near significant heists. Initially, one might consider this mere coincidence, even as the intriguing presence of Vivek Prasanna hints at a potential action star role. At this juncture, we accept the unfolding events. Meanwhile, a sophisticated Deputy Commissioner (Gautam Vasudev Menon), a somewhat less polished yet highly persuasive Minister (Charan Raj), and his chief henchman (Tamizh) are introduced into the narrative. A series of murders targeting secondary henchmen and the theft of vast sums of black money create an air of mystery. The identity of the perpetrator remains uncertain, though it is likely that audiences will deduce the answer with ease, diminishing the thrill of speculation. What remains is the anticipation of when the filmmakers will reveal the crux of the story.
The lighter scenes featuring Hitler proved to be more effective due to the palpable effort behind them. The romantic subplot, while following familiar patterns, offered a refreshing perspective. Riya and Vijay Antony successfully infused charm into their performances, presenting a love story that unfolds alongside the main narrative, albeit in a somewhat haphazard manner. Furthermore, Vijay Antony has made significant strides in harmonizing his well-known action persona with the more endearing aspects of his acting abilities. However, this romantic angle tends to linger longer than necessary, as the primary themes of heist, trauma, and revenge are relegated to the background.
Hitler was well-prepared, featuring a commendable cast and a capable technical team, which includes composers Vivek-Mervin and cinematographer Naveen Kumar. It is indeed surprising that Dhana, known for his impactful work in Vaanam Kottattum, has opted for this direction in his second film. Amidst numerous disappointments, he demonstrates a talent for staging and creating the appropriate visuals. Although he misses the mark in several areas, Dhana successfully accomplishes a few significant aspects. For example, there is a scene where he effectively portrays the environment in which the embezzled money is being counted and sorted. This image is striking, yet it ultimately lacks substantial impact. This encapsulates the core issue with Hitler: the political elements are insufficiently political, the power-seekers lack menace, the tonal transitions are overly abrupt, and the henchmen fail to embody their roles convincingly. The essence of the critique is clear.
The title of the film, consistent with Vijay Antony's tendency to select 'negative' names, sets the tone for a narrative that ultimately feels like a missed opportunity. The actions of both the protagonists and antagonists suggest a depth that the film fails to achieve. What is presented on screen does not align with the intelligence the creators attribute to it. Fortunately, the film refrains from making grandiose assertions about enacting systemic change. It acknowledges the fundamental principles of capitalism and the significance of 'image' in the realm of politics. However, Hitler ultimately serves as a disappointing critique of dictatorship, resembling a mere gimmick, much like its title. As the credits rolled, I was left with a pressing question: Why maintain an air of secrecy when the audience is shown the cards from the outset?
Hitler Movie Director: Dhana
Hitler Movie Cast: Vijay Antony, Charan Raj, Riya Suman, Gautam Vasudev Menon, Tamizh
Best Shopping Apps
